GAZA CONFLICT AND GLOBAL APPROACH
1. Context and Background
- Incident: Killing of Hamas chief Yahya Sinwar in Gaza by Israeli forces on October 16, 2024.
- Significance: Sinwar’s assassination represents a key milestone in Israel’s campaign against Hamas, following the assassination of previous Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in July 2024.
- Broader Impact: Rising civilian casualties and the lack of diplomatic initiatives have escalated humanitarian concerns and political tensions.
2. Positions of Global Powers
- United States: Preoccupied with domestic issues, the U.S. has not successfully pushed for a ceasefire, despite its influence in the region.
- China: Seeks to build influence by supporting Palestinian sovereignty from a decolonization perspective and maintaining a stance that fosters its relations with Arab and Iranian allies.
- India: Adopts a dual stance by supporting counter-terrorism initiatives while also upholding a two-state solution, balancing its ties with both Israel and Palestine.
3. Regional and Global Diplomacy
- China's Influence: Actively engaging in West Asia, hosting Palestinian factions to support unity, yet avoiding direct condemnation of Hamas to preserve diplomatic leverage.
- India’s Balanced Approach: Maintains a strategic and moderate stance, supporting Israel’s fight against terrorism while backing the two-state solution, showing a commitment to both international peace and regional stability.
4. Global South’s Position
- Fragmented Stance: Countries within the Global South, like South Africa, have taken varied stances, often based on their historical experiences and national interests.
- Divergent Paths in BRICS: While China views BRICS expansion as a way to solidify its influence, India remains cautious about overextending BRICS’ scope and has focused more on specific bilateral ties.
5. Broader Implications
- India-China Contestation: Represents a lack of cohesion within the Global South, with each prioritizing distinct regional strategies in West Asia.
- Challenges in Mediation: Limited military and diplomatic leverage prevent countries in the Global South from leading peace initiatives effectively, indicating an unmet need for stable international mediation.
Analytical Question
- Evaluate the impact of the assassination of Yahya Sinwar on the Israel-Palestine conflict and discuss its implications for regional stability.
- Analyze India’s diplomatic stance on the Israel-Palestine conflict, considering its emphasis on counter-terrorism and support for a two-state solution.
- Discuss the role of China and India in the evolving dynamics of the Israel-Palestine conflict. How does their approach reflect the broader strategic considerations within the Global South?
- With reference to recent developments in West Asia, critically analyze the challenges faced by the Global South in acting as a unified entity on international issues.
Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs)
The recent assassination of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar occurred in which region?
- A) West Bank
- B) Gaza
- C) Syria
- D) Lebanon
- Answer: B) Gaza
Which country recently took Israel to the International Court of Justice (ICJ) over the Palestinian issue?
- A) India
- B) China
- C) South Africa
- D) Brazil
- Answer: C) South Africa
Which of the following describes India’s approach to the Israel-Palestine conflict?
- A) Complete support to Palestine
- B) Full alignment with Israel
- C) Support for counter-terrorism and two-state solution
- D) Neutral and non-interventionist
- Answer: C) Support for counter-terrorism and two-state solution
The idea of the Global South represents which of the following?
- A) Economic union of developing nations
- B) Political and economic alliance of all democracies
- C) Group of developing countries with shared economic and political interests
- D) Military alliance of non-aligned countries
- Answer: C) Group of developing countries with shared economic and political interests
MCQs
Which of the following is an essential component of India’s foreign policy towards the Israel-Palestine conflict?
- A) Opposing the two-state solution
- B) Complete non-engagement
- C) Balanced stance with support for counter-terrorism and a two-state solution
- D) Prioritizing ties with Israel only
- Answer: C) Balanced stance with support for counter-terrorism and a two-state solution
The International Court of Justice (ICJ) handles cases concerning which of the following?
- A) Trade agreements between countries
- B) Human rights violations by private entities
- C) Disputes between states and international law violations
- D) Economic policy disagreements within the WTO
- Answer: C) Disputes between states and international law violations
ANALYTICAL QUESTIONS
- Examine the complexities of India’s position on the Israel-Palestine issue. How does India balance its stance on counter-terrorism and support for Palestine?
- Discuss the role of emerging powers like India and China in the changing dynamics of the Israel-Palestine conflict. How do these countries’ actions reflect their strategic interests in the region?
Comments
Post a Comment